[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#68274: automake 1.16j nonnumerical version confuses scripts
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
bug#68274: automake 1.16j nonnumerical version confuses scripts |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Jan 2024 01:49:46 -0500 |
On 13 Jan 2024 15:58, Karl Berry wrote:
> Another alternative: when this came up 30-odd years ago, rms changed the
> GNU maintainers doc to suggest x.y.90, .91, etc. for pretests. Doing
> that would at least have the benefit of following a recommendation, and
> as a side effect, would also fix jami's assumption (poor practice though
> it is, IMHO).
> https://gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Test-Releases.html#Test-Releases
>
> Doing an ls -R on alpha (fp:/srv/data/ftp-mirror/alpha/gnu), it seems
> (rough guess with some grep counting) the .90 convention is by far the
> most common approach (a couple thousand), followed by the suffix letter
> a la automake (~750 releases), followed by -rc (~360). -hexid and -date
> are both trailing the field. Other random conventions also present.
>
> It all feels like bikeshedding to me, so my inclination is to do
> nothing. If we do change, I think we should use .90. --best, karl.
using .90 is certainly better than single-letters. if you're fine with
it, then let's switch.
i cut more inline responses to avoid further bikeshedding on the topic.
we can agree to disagree.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
bug#68274: automake 1.16j nonnumerical version confuses scripts, Karl Berry, 2024/01/21