bug-automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#54020: Allow user-defined libtool options


From: Roumen Petrov
Subject: bug#54020: Allow user-defined libtool options
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 19:22:38 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18

Hi,

Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 16 Jan 2024 22:43, Roumen Petrov wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 13 Jan 2024 22:29, Bogdan wrote:
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, 2024-01-13 07:19:
On 15 Mar 2023 17:31, Bogdan wrote:
     Another patch from my side. This one makes it possible for users to
pass additional options to libtool in 'compile' mode. Fixes #54020.

[SNIP]

Libtool support options that allows user to pass flags either or compiler or 
linker.
I cannot see needs for more flags and variables.

sorry, but i'm not following what you're trying to say here
-mike

In automake we could use target_XXXX or AM_XXXX to define flags.

Patch does not add new XXXX if I understand properly.
It is just to wrap "compile command". Simplified version of command when 
libtool is integrated with automake is
LTCOMPILE=$(LIBTOOL) ... $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) --mode=compile $(CC) ...

Patch propose more complex syntax i.e. ... --mode=compile $(PRE-FLAG) $(CC) ... 
$(POST-FLAGS)


For flags supported by libtool mode we could use command 
./libtool--mode=compile --help
Some of arguments are controlled by configuration as goal of libtool is to hide 
complexity of library build and build of position independent code.
The user may break this with unsuitable values in PRE-FLAG.
What are other options :
-no-suppress (1) i.e.  do not redirect subsequent compilations to null device
-Wc,... (2)


Case (1)
This is exceptional case.
Remark: usual compilation is shared and static i.e. libtool shows errors from 
first.

(a) With LIBTOOLFLAGS=-verbose flag we will could see commands. If second (static) 
build fail we could just copy & paste without redirection.

(b) Also we could update Makefile and to set -no-suppress and to debug 
compilation failure.

(c) We could configure with --disable-shared.  As result static compilation is 
only one i.e. first and libtool will shows errors.


So (a) or (b) or (c) ?


Case (2)
We could always run CC='cc my-flags' make -e or to use updated CFLAGS or ....  
This is also valid for linker.
So what to do with $(POST-FLAGS) as we could pass flags at build time?
It is not only for -Wc,... Also -Xcompiler should work fine.


Regards,
Roumen

----

P.S. With other words CFLAGS='-Wall -W.... -W....' ./configure --disable-shared 
 ... replaces patch.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]