[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: last line of output missing in xterms
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: last line of output missing in xterms |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:30:22 -0500 (EST) |
In article <156388ec.0212021151.51a48df1@posting.google.com> you write:
>I have just been investigating this problem, and it's worse than that.
>Somehow bash version 2.05b.0(1) is over-writing every line of output
>from the beginning of the line in order to add one character to the
>end of the line. A simple example is given by the following:
It has to do with the multibyte locale support. Try this patch:
*** ../bash-2.05b/lib/readline/display.c Tue Jun 4 10:54:47 2002
--- lib/readline/display.c Fri Sep 13 16:22:57 2002
***************
*** 71,75 ****
#if defined (HANDLE_MULTIBYTE)
! static int _rl_col_width PARAMS((char *, int, int));
static int *_rl_wrapped_line;
#else
--- 71,75 ----
#if defined (HANDLE_MULTIBYTE)
! static int _rl_col_width PARAMS((const char *, int, int));
static int *_rl_wrapped_line;
#else
***************
*** 1349,1355 ****
_rl_output_some_chars (nfd + lendiff, temp - lendiff);
#if 0
- _rl_last_c_pos += _rl_col_width (nfd+lendiff, 0, temp-lendiff) -
col_lendiff;
- #else
_rl_last_c_pos += _rl_col_width (nfd+lendiff, 0,
temp-col_lendiff);
#endif
}
--- 1349,1355 ----
_rl_output_some_chars (nfd + lendiff, temp - lendiff);
#if 0
_rl_last_c_pos += _rl_col_width (nfd+lendiff, 0,
temp-col_lendiff);
+ #else
+ _rl_last_c_pos += _rl_col_width (nfd+lendiff, 0, temp-lendiff);
#endif
}
***************
*** 1511,1516 ****
/* If we have multibyte characters, NEW is indexed by the buffer point in
a multibyte string, but _rl_last_c_pos is the display position. In
! this case, NEW's display position is not obvious. */
! if ((MB_CUR_MAX == 1 || rl_byte_oriented ) && _rl_last_c_pos == new) return;
#else
if (_rl_last_c_pos == new) return;
--- 1511,1523 ----
/* If we have multibyte characters, NEW is indexed by the buffer point in
a multibyte string, but _rl_last_c_pos is the display position. In
! this case, NEW's display position is not obvious and must be
! calculated. */
! if (MB_CUR_MAX == 1 || rl_byte_oriented)
! {
! if (_rl_last_c_pos == new)
! return;
! }
! else if (_rl_last_c_pos == _rl_col_width (data, 0, new))
! return;
#else
if (_rl_last_c_pos == new) return;
***************
*** 1595,1603 ****
{
if (MB_CUR_MAX > 1 && rl_byte_oriented == 0)
! {
! tputs (_rl_term_cr, 1, _rl_output_character_function);
! for (i = 0; i < new; i++)
! putc (data[i], rl_outstream);
! }
else
_rl_backspace (_rl_last_c_pos - new);
--- 1602,1606 ----
{
if (MB_CUR_MAX > 1 && rl_byte_oriented == 0)
! _rl_backspace (_rl_last_c_pos - _rl_col_width (data, 0, new));
else
_rl_backspace (_rl_last_c_pos - new);
***************
*** 2118,2122 ****
static int
_rl_col_width (str, start, end)
! char *str;
int start, end;
{
--- 2121,2125 ----
static int
_rl_col_width (str, start, end)
! const char *str;
int start, end;
{
***************
*** 2194,2196 ****
}
#endif /* HANDLE_MULTIBYTE */
-
--- 2197,2198 ----
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet )
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@po.CWRU.Edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: last line of output missing in xterms,
Chet Ramey <=