[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bash: no job control in this shell
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: bash: no job control in this shell |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:21:51 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >You would probably need "q\n" in order to get the data flushed to the
> >subprocess. This is probably a stdio buffering issue. When the stdio
> >library determines that the output is not a tty then the output is
> >buffered into large blocks for performance reasons.
>
> That doesn't sound right, wouldn't an fflush be better? The '\n' might
> have undesired side effects.
I was taking that experience from using less inside of an emacs shell
window. It works there. :^}
Bob