[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vi editing mode + color prompt = trouble?
From: |
Halim Issa |
Subject: |
Re: vi editing mode + color prompt = trouble? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:26:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.7; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; ) |
Thanks for replying!
On Saturday 13 December 2008 04:38:43 Chet Ramey wrote:
> Halim Issa wrote:
> > Type "one two three four five six seven eight" press ESCape and 7 B to go
> > seven words back. This takes me right in the middle of the prompt while
> > displaying (args:7) on the prompt. Once it removes the (args:7) info, ie
> > when I press the "B", the cursor location is messed up and I end up in
> > the middle of the prompt, instead of at the word "two" where I should be.
>
> I can't reproduce this with xterm, aterm, or Terminal on Mac OS X with
> bash-3.2.48.
I've tried it some more, and have come across the same problem on both CentOS
and Slackware, who have rather different systems. Both relate only to using
escape sequences to change intensity only, not the full ansi-code for blink
and colours and such...
I have also tried in both xterm and konsole (KDE). If you need my .bashrc to
check, please let me know. Since I've now seen this on multiple machines with
the same result, maybe I'm to blame somewhere, but you've already seen the
prompt command - nothing overly special except the ansi bold escape...
> I have made display fixes for possibly-related problems displaying numeric
> arguments; maybe those will fix your problem. They will come out with
> bash-4.0.
Great - I'm staying tuned for it!
On a non-related note - there are still rumors around that bash 3.2 has some
problems with `running backtick commands` compared to the new $(way to do it)
- isn't this fixed in the first few patches of 3.2, or are there still
compatibility issues from 3.1 to 3.2, and will there be similar changes moving
onwards from 3.x to 4.0 ?
Thanks again!