[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -e and permission denied
From: |
victor |
Subject: |
Re: -e and permission denied |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Oct 2013 04:48:59 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Friday, October 4, 2013 3:41:58 PM UTC+4, Eric Blake wrote:
> If you care about the difference between ENOENT and EPERM, then write
> your program in C or other language, not shell. There is no way for the
> shell to tell you what errno the OS returned.
I was talking only about documentation change (so people might decide that they
need distinct ENOENT and EPERM in their particular case)
> The shell is not going to
> change just because of your request.
Of course, I understand. That was just proposal. If BASH maintainers still
think current documentation is ok, I won't insist.
- Re: -e and permission denied, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: -e and permission denied, victor, 2013/10/03
- Re: -e and permission denied, Eric Blake, 2013/10/03
- Message not available
- Re: -e and permission denied, victor, 2013/10/03
- Re: -e and permission denied, Eric Blake, 2013/10/03
- Message not available
- Re: -e and permission denied, victor, 2013/10/03
- Re: -e and permission denied, victor, 2013/10/03
- Re: -e and permission denied, Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 2013/10/03
- Message not available
- Re: -e and permission denied, victor, 2013/10/04
- Re: -e and permission denied, Chris Down, 2013/10/04
- Re: -e and permission denied, Eric Blake, 2013/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: -e and permission denied,
victor <=