[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug: illegal function name?
|
From: |
Chet Ramey |
|
Subject: |
Re: bug: illegal function name? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:16:10 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 |
On 1/20/19 4:03 PM, Andrey Butirsky wrote:
> Chet, the sample was run in normal, not POSIX, mode.
> So it allows '1a' but disallows '1'. Pretty odd.
Yeah, it should not reject all digits when not in posix mode. I'll take
a look there.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Ilkka Virta, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo Bustamante, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo Bustamante, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Robert Elz, 2019/01/20