[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles
From: |
konsolebox |
Subject: |
Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:10:44 +0800 |
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:19 PM Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> wrote:
>
> Just like that one time L. Walsh tried to write a bash boot script that
> used <() to populate an array, and it failed because she was running
> it too early in the boot sequence, and /dev/fd/ wasn't available yet.
@Chet, Isn't bash supposed to use named pipes alternatively, and
dynamically? Or does it just decide what to use based on the current
system?
-- konsolebox
- Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles, (continued)
- Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles, Greg Wooledge, 2019/04/11
- Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles, Chet Ramey, 2019/04/11
- Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles, Robert Elz, 2019/04/11
- Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles, Chet Ramey, 2019/04/11
- Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles, konsolebox, 2019/04/10
Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles, konsolebox, 2019/04/09
Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles,
konsolebox <=