|
From: | Dennis Clarke |
Subject: | Re: built-in printf %f parameter format depend on LC_NUMERIC |
Date: | Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:36:07 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.0 |
On 7/12/19 3:22 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 7/12/19 3:16 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:On 7/12/19 12:46 PM, Léa Gris wrote:Le 09/07/2019 à 22:02, Chet Ramey écrivait :These are up to the system's strtol/strtod. I don't know of too many strtol implementations that use the thousands separator and numeric grouping.Chet and you other Bash maintainers or contributors dudes: I can foresee the implications and blockages even lightly considering the possibility to align the Bash's built-in printf behavior with the %f argument with the sibling GNU Coreutils printf implementation.I don't think I explained this very well. For input, the printf builtin relies on strtod(3) to parse the string into a floating point number. For output, it relies on printf(3) to display a floating point number as a string. I'm not really interested in re-implementing either one if the system libc provides one that's perfectly acceptable. On POSIX-conformant systems, those library functions generally honor the locale's decimal_point character as the radix character. The `bc' you're using isn't POSIX conformant.https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/bc.html#tag_20_09_16 "The bc utility always uses the <period> ( '.' ) character to represent a radix point, regardless of any decimal-point character specified as
Imagine that ... learn something new from something very old : corv $ locale -a | grep -i 'utf' | grep 'fr' fr.UTF-8 fr_BE.UTF-8 fr_BE.UTF-8@euro fr_CA.UTF-8 fr_CH.UTF-8 fr_FR.UTF-8 fr_FR.UTF-8@euro fr_LU.UTF-8 corv $ corv $ LC_ALL=fr_FR.UTF-8 bc scale=8 a = 0,1 syntax error on line 2, teletype a = 0.1 b = 0.01 c = a + b c .11 corv $ corv $ LC_ALL=fr_FR.UTF-8 /usr/xpg6/bin/bc -l a = 0,1 syntax error on line 1, teletype a = 0.1 b = 0.01 c = a + b c .11 c(c) .99395609795669685035 corv $ Well now. That is XPG6 compliant bc on Solaris 10 sparc. It could care less about locale it seems. Nifty. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |