[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expression evaluation problem
From: |
L A Walsh |
Subject: |
Re: expression evaluation problem |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jul 2019 03:04:12 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird |
On 2019/07/25 11:15, Ilkka Virta wrote:
> On 24.7. 21:43, L A Walsh wrote:
>
>> The important part for me is whether or not it is faster to perform
>> 1 calculation, or 100. So which would be faster? In this case
>> execution speed
>> is more important than clarity. I consider that a 'constraint'.
>>
>
> Shouldn't it be easy enough to measure how much restructuring that
> expression affects the execution speed?
>
---
Which I did and found a 25% difference using the test case I used. It
would likely be less in shorter strings, more in longer ones.
> Also, regarding execution speed, I've been led to believe that the shell
> in general is rather slow, and almost any other language would be better
> if that is of concern. (awk, Perl, what have you.)
>
----
True, assembly would probably be the best choice if that was a sole
concern,
but sometimes I want to have an example of how to do something using only 1
language. Similarly, many perl modules have versions that require a
compiler to
install, but some that are perl-only can work with perls going back to
5.6 or up
to 5.30 with no recompilation step. So sometimes there's a desire for
an efficient implementation, while staying within the same language.
Similarly, by not using some newer bash features, one can have
scripts that
are portable to a wider range of bash versions.
>
>