[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: valid kernel patch? using -e to catch errors?
From: |
L A Walsh |
Subject: |
Re: valid kernel patch? using -e to catch errors? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:55:26 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird |
On 2019/07/29 22:49, kre@munnari.OZ.AU wrote:
> | I didn't see this come back from the list and it was sent
> | 45 minutes ago (vs. other emails of mine that have come
> | back in under a minute).
> | Did anyone else see it?
>
> Yes. The original appeared (before this repeat). Avoid
> being impatient, all kinds of things can delay e-mail (a once
> an hour retry is not uncommon - so 45 mins is certainly not
> long enough to wait before becoming concerned - allow at least
> a day).
>
---
Atypical behavior is cause for concern. The list received the posting,
but FYI, I still haven't received either post.
> | FWIW, the below is from the publicly posted change notes
> | for the 5.2.3 patch.
>
> I have no idea what patch you're talking about, as it has
> nothing to do with any system I run.
>
Then why not ignore it? Why respond to it? You've given it more response
feedback than anyone. It's from the kernel patch notes and is
from a patch that went into the linux kernel.