[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
memleak in execute_function?
From: |
fireshen |
Subject: |
memleak in execute_function? |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:26:52 -0700 (MST) |
Hey all,
I suspect there is a memleak in bash.
I use the bash 4.4.23 (fedora Linux) with ASAN. Then I run some testcases
and find a memleak.
<http://gnu-bash.2382.n7.nabble.com/file/t3069/gs.png>
I think we need to free this "gs" in execute_cmd.c
*gs* = sh_getopt_save_istate ();
if (subshell == 0)
{
begin_unwind_frame ("function_calling");
push_context (var->name, subshell, temporary_env);
/* This has to be before the pop_context(), because the unwinding of
local variables may cause the restore of a local declaration of
OPTIND to force a getopts state reset. */
add_unwind_protect (maybe_restore_getopt_state, *gs*);
add_unwind_protect (pop_context, (char *)NULL);
unwind_protect_int (line_number);
unwind_protect_int (line_number_for_err_trap);
unwind_protect_int (function_line_number);
unwind_protect_int (return_catch_flag);
unwind_protect_jmp_buf (return_catch);
add_unwind_protect (dispose_command, (char *)tc);
unwind_protect_pointer (this_shell_function);
unwind_protect_int (funcnest);
unwind_protect_int (loop_level);
}
else
push_context (var->name, subshell, temporary_env); /* don't
unwind-protect for subshells */
Is this a bug? Just analyze the code.
--
Sent from: http://gnu-bash.2382.n7.nabble.com/
- memleak in execute_function?,
fireshen <=