[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brac
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion) |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:31:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 |
On 12/12/19 9:57 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
The backquote is in [6], and the backslash disappears, you just get the
pair of quotes in [2] because that's how printf %q outputs an empty string.
-----
I'm sorry, but you are mistaken.
The characters from 'Z' (0x5A) through 'z' (0x61) are:
0x5A 0x5B 0x5C 0x5D 0x5E 0x5F 0x60 0x61
Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a
the backslash comes between the two square brackets.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2019-12/msg00017.html
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., (continued)
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., L A Walsh, 2019/12/24
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., Eli Schwartz, 2019/12/24
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., Robert Elz, 2019/12/24
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., Eli Schwartz, 2019/12/24
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., Stephane Chazelas, 2019/12/25
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., Robert Elz, 2019/12/24
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., Greg Wooledge, 2019/12/23
- Re: Unicode range and enumeration support., L A Walsh, 2019/12/23
- Re: unquoted expansion not working (was Re: Not missing, but very hard to see), Robert Elz, 2019/12/14
- Re: unquoted expansion not working (was Re: Not missing, but very hard to see), L A Walsh, 2019/12/15
- Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion),
Chet Ramey <=
Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion, Robert Elz, 2019/12/06