Re: math operations with base#prefix

[Kerin Millar]

On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:08:25 +0200
alex xmb ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com> wrote:

> so u mean a $ sign requirement ?

For dereferencing variable identifiers in base#n notation, yes.

> i didnt get the base values , i tried simple one
> i faced the ' without $ it doesnt work '

I don't fully understand this sentence. Anyway, it works as described in the 
manual.

> 
> This is what matters. The implied complaint is that the $ symbols have to
> > be there and that they should somehow be optional. In other words, Victor
> > wants for "res = 10#res1 + 10#res2" to be able to consider res1 and res2
> 
> 
> optional as in make default values in if empty ?

No. Victor wants for, say, "10#res1" to consider res1 as an identifier, instead 
of a number. I can't know how it could be stated any more clearly.

-- 
Kerin Millar