bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Idea: jobs(1) -i to print only :%ID:s


From: alex xmb sw ratchev
Subject: Re: Idea: jobs(1) -i to print only :%ID:s
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 23:11:13 +0100

On Thu, Nov 9, 2023, 11:08 PM alex xmb sw ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023, 10:56 PM Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 10:17:35PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> > On Nov 09 2023, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> >
>> > >     re='^\[([0-9]+)\]'
>> > >     jobspecs=()
>> > >     while IFS= read -r line; do
>> > >         if [[ $line =~ $re ]]; then
>> > >             jobspecs+=( "%${BASH_REMATCH[1]}" )
>> > >         fi
>> > >     done < <(jobs -l)
>> >
>> > That fails for multi-line commands that happen to contain matches for
>> > re.
>> >
>> > $ (sleep 100; printf $'\n[100]\n') &
>>
>> Fair enough.  I believe *nothing* would work in that case; the output of
>> "jobs -l" cannot be safely parsed in its current form.
>>
>> Adding a NUL-delimited output option might work around that, but if we're
>> modifying the jobs builtin, we might as well just add the -i or -j option
>> instead.
>>
>
> ther'd be few different values for seps , i think ifs is nearly none , so
> , one is per element , one per record
> others may also exist
> so just two constant opts to align extend usage
>

i d have a half example about such formatting for printf

( pre ) ( sep for 2+ elements ) ( elem pre ( also elem N pre ) ) $elem (
elem stu or and N th ) ( end )

missing some terms also ..

>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]