[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments
From: |
Zachary Santer |
Subject: |
Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:57:21 -0400 |
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:12 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
>
> That stuff changed last month, after bash-5.3-alpha was released. Before
> that change, neither interactive nor non-interactive shells checked the
> list of saved statuses. The difference was when the user was notified of
> a process's exit status and when a job was removed from the jobs list.
Not sure I want to commit myself to spinning up a RHEL 9 VM just to
keep this conversation moving, Nobody had any answers in my help-bash
thread on this topic, but does the devel branch have any build
dependency that differs from those of the master and pre-release
branches?
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/07
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/07
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/07
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/12
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments,
Zachary Santer <=
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/14
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/15
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/21
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/21
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/12
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/12
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/14
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/14
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/16
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/26