[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault
From: |
wilson at specifixinc dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault |
Date: |
8 Jun 2005 20:00:05 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-06-08
20:00 -------
Richard, is my solution (a warning) acceptable? Or do you have another
suggestion?
It might be possible to do better, either add more code to get the unwind info
correct in this case, or add code to determine when the warning is not necessary
(as in this case), but I'm not motivated to try either, as I don't believe this
assembler construct should be valid in the first place.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=994
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug gas/994] New: section switch in function causes segfault, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2005/06/07
- [Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault, nickc at redhat dot com, 2005/06/08
- [Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault, nickc at redhat dot com, 2005/06/08
- [Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault, wilson at specifixinc dot com, 2005/06/08
- [Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault, wilson at specifixinc dot com, 2005/06/08
- [Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault, wilson at specifixinc dot com, 2005/06/08
- [Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault,
wilson at specifixinc dot com <=
- [Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2005/06/08
- [Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault, wilson at specifixinc dot com, 2005/06/08