[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax
From: |
hjl at lucon dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax |
Date: |
7 Feb 2007 17:51:07 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-02-07 17:51 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Regarding comment #2 and #3, I think the purpose of noprefix is to *allow*
> source to omit the "%" prefix, ie. make the prefix optional. I don't think it
> should force you to omit the prefix, especially in AT&T mode.
I don't mind keeping the current behavior for "noprefix". But we should update
manual and add a couple testcases for both Intel and AT&T modes.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3993
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug gas/3993] New: Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, jbeulich at novell dot com, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax,
hjl at lucon dot org <=