Re: [ARM/THUMB] Incorrect branch generated for long calls

[Rafaël Carré]

On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:29:55 +0200
Tristan Gingold <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 15:35 +0200, Rafaël Carré wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I just met a possible bug in binutils 2.20.1 when mixing ARM/Thumb
> >> code under some conditions.
> >> 
> >> I wouldn't mind a confirmation that it's a real bug before opening
> >> an entry in bugzilla.
> > 
> > This is indeed a bug in binutils 2.20.1.  However, it has already
> > been fixed in trunk binutils.
> > 
> > If binutils 2.20.2 was to be released I would consider backporting a
> > fix.  However, I believe the next release of binutils will be 2.21
> > which will have this fix in.
> 
> Feel free to backport it in the 2.20 branch.

Just in case someone needs it, here it is (I didn't modify the tests)

-- 
Rafaël Carré

ld-thumb-interwork-long-call.diff
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature