[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116
From: |
amodra at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116.32732' isn't defined |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:36:34 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14272
--- Comment #14 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> 2012-11-01 23:36:34
UTC ---
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the situation was that lto output object
files were referencing IR only symbols. That is a gcc bug, even if those
places in the lto output are not ever actually used.
If we hide this error in ld like gold appears to do, then we run the risk of
not reporting a problem that will cause runtime errors if lto should ever emit
similar code that *is* used.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116.32732' isn't defined, amodra at gmail dot com, 2012/11/01
- [Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116.32732' isn't defined, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/11/01
- [Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116.32732' isn't defined,
amodra at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116.32732' isn't defined, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/11/01
- [Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116.32732' isn't defined, amodra at gmail dot com, 2012/11/01
- [Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116.32732' isn't defined, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/11/13
- [Bug ld/14272] gold links, but bfd fails with: hidden symbol `.LTHUNK116.32732' isn't defined, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/11/13