[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/14940] New: -pie issues with TLS relocations
From: |
jakub at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/14940] New: -pie issues with TLS relocations |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:08:13 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
Bug #: 14940
Summary: -pie issues with TLS relocations
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: address@hidden
ReportedBy: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden, address@hidden,
address@hidden
Depends on: 6443
Classification: Unclassified
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #6443 +++
__thread int a;
__thread int b __attribute((tls_model ("local-exec")));
__thread int c __attribute((tls_model ("initial-exec")));
__thread int d __attribute((tls_model ("local-dynamic")));
__thread int e __attribute((tls_model ("global-dynamic")));
int
main (void)
{
return a + b + c + d + e;
}
compiled/linked with -O2 -pie -fpie on various arches either doesn't link at
all,
or makes completely unnecessarily a DT_TEXTREL PIE. Tried x86_64, i386, ppc,
ppc64. For the TLS transitions and relocations, PIEs should be handled like
other executables, so many info->shared checks need to be replaced with
!info->executable. For the TLS relocations, even when the executable is
position independent, the offsets within the PIE's TLS block are known at link
time and so relocations like R_X86_64_TPOFF32 can be relocated fully at link
time.
While this is now fixed on i?86/x86_64 and perhaps ppc/ppc64, it isn't fixed on
s390/s390x. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872148
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/14940] New: -pie issues with TLS relocations,
jakub at redhat dot com <=