[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in
From: |
hjl.tools at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:33:29 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22842
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > Created attachment 10816 [details]
> > A patch
> >
> > Please try this.
>
> The runtime warning is gone, but I still get two different values for the
> address:
>
> $ ./run.sh
> 0x55d0082e2580 0x7f00497992d0
>
> The symbol foo is also just a plain undefined:
>
> 0000000000000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND foo
Fixed on master branch by
commit 1031c264fd23641111df1e12a35d0a8f7e82fb80
Author: H.J. Lu <address@hidden>
Date: Tue Feb 13 14:31:53 2018 -0800
x86: Properly check building shared library
If a symbol is not defined in a regular file, and we are not generating
a shared library, then set the symbol to its location in the .plt. This
is required to make function pointers compare as equal between the normal
executable and the shared library.
* elfxx-x86.c (elf_x86_allocate_dynrelocs): Check bfd_link_dll,
instead of bfd_link_pic, for building shared library.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/22842] New: Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better,
hjl.tools at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, ccoutant at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/02/13
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2018/02/14
- [Bug ld/22842] Handling of R_X86_64_PC32 in a PIE against a function in a shared library could be better, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/02/14