[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes
From: |
danglin at gcc dot gnu.org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:26:23 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26356
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There is this function som_bfd_copy_private_section_data() which is never
called but it looks like it should be called when objcopy is run. This is the
reason
container is NULL in the output section. It never got copied from the input.
>From the ChangeLogs, it looks like it used to be called.
Alan, do you have a suggestion on what to change so it is called?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/26356] New: FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/08
- [Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/09
- [Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes,
danglin at gcc dot gnu.org <=
- [Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes, amodra at gmail dot com, 2020/08/10
- [Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/11
- [Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/20
- [Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/27
- [Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/27