[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to i
From: |
nick.alcock at oracle dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:20:52 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31882
--- Comment #7 from Nick Alcock <nick.alcock at oracle dot com> ---
Thanks, Alan. I can start using %z without fear from now on, as opposed to just
accidentally using it out of habit and then cursing and reverting it when it
breaks on mingw. (I'm fairly sure that when libctf was first merged, %z didn't
work on at least one platform. Nowadays the GCC shipped with mingw complains
about it, but this is a bug in that version of GCC -- fixed in later releases
-- and the actual mingw libc handles it fine.)
Thanks for the fix!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug libctf/31882] New: libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers, awilfox at adelielinux dot org, 2024/06/11
- [Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers, sam at gentoo dot org, 2024/06/11
- [Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2024/06/12
- [Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers, amodra at gmail dot com, 2024/06/12
- [Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers, nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2024/06/12
- [Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers, amodra at gmail dot com, 2024/06/12
- [Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers, awilfox at adelielinux dot org, 2024/06/12
- [Bug libctf/31882] libctf: fails test suite on 32-bit platforms due to incorrect format specifiers,
nick.alcock at oracle dot com <=