[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the de
From: |
oset at superbox dot pl |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Oct 2024 10:55:09 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32243
oset <oset at superbox dot pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |oset at superbox dot pl
--- Comment #4 from oset <oset at superbox dot pl> ---
NAME_MAX seem to 255 in VC.
VC9
~~~
$ grep -r -nH NAME_MAX *
limits.h:117:#define NAME_MAX 255
stdio.h:111:#define FILENAME_MAX 260
~~~
VC6
~~~
$ grep -r -nH NAME_MAX *
CRT/SRC/STDIO.H:216:#define FILENAME_MAX 260
(...)
Include/LIMITS.H:107:#define NAME_MAX 255
Include/STDIO.H:200:#define FILENAME_MAX 260
~~~
Same as in Linux:
~~~
$ grep -r -nH -w NAME_MAX *
linux/limits.h:11:#define NAME_MAX 255 /* # chars in a file name */
~~~
Same in MinGW
~~~
$ grep -r -nH -w NAME_MAX *
limits.h:108:#define NAME_MAX 255
~~~
I can't say for newer ones but it can be assumed that if it was N for X years
prior, it will be after. That is not something you change on a whim.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/32243] New: NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro, euloanty at live dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro, euloanty at live dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro, euloanty at live dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2024/10/08
- [Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro, amodra at gmail dot com, 2024/10/09
- [Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro,
oset at superbox dot pl <=
- [Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro, amodra at gmail dot com, 2024/10/09
- [Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro, oset at superbox dot pl, 2024/10/09