bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug gprofng/32356] New: [2.44 Regression] missing symbols in libgprofng


From: doko at debian dot org
Subject: [Bug gprofng/32356] New: [2.44 Regression] missing symbols in libgprofng0
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:39:13 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32356

            Bug ID: 32356
           Summary: [2.44 Regression] missing symbols in libgprofng0
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gprofng
          Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
          Reporter: doko at debian dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

building binutils from the trunk shows missing symbols compared to 2.43. If
that is intended, then probably the soname should be bumped on the trunk.

+#MISSING: 2.43.50.20241112-1#
_ZN10CallStackP14add_stack_javaEP14DataDescriptorlP11FramePacketxjP6VectorIP8DbeInstrEbP14cstk_ctx
_chunk@Base 2.41
+
_ZN10CallStackP14add_stack_javaEP14DataDescriptorlP11FramePacketxjP6VectorIP8HistableEbP14cstk_ctx_chunk@Base
2.43.50.20241112-
1


+#MISSING: 2.43.50.20241112-1#
_ZN10CallStackP23add_stack_java_epilogueEP14DataDescriptorlP11FramePacketxjP6VectorIP8DbeInstrEPS4
_IP8HistableEb@Base 2.41
+
_ZN10CallStackP23add_stack_java_epilogueEP14DataDescriptorlP11FramePacketxjP6VectorIP8HistableES8_b@Base
2.43.50.20241112-1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]