[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gprofng/32356] New: [2.44 Regression] missing symbols in libgprofng
From: |
doko at debian dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug gprofng/32356] New: [2.44 Regression] missing symbols in libgprofng0 |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:39:13 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32356
Bug ID: 32356
Summary: [2.44 Regression] missing symbols in libgprofng0
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
building binutils from the trunk shows missing symbols compared to 2.43. If
that is intended, then probably the soname should be bumped on the trunk.
+#MISSING: 2.43.50.20241112-1#
_ZN10CallStackP14add_stack_javaEP14DataDescriptorlP11FramePacketxjP6VectorIP8DbeInstrEbP14cstk_ctx
_chunk@Base 2.41
+
_ZN10CallStackP14add_stack_javaEP14DataDescriptorlP11FramePacketxjP6VectorIP8HistableEbP14cstk_ctx_chunk@Base
2.43.50.20241112-
1
+#MISSING: 2.43.50.20241112-1#
_ZN10CallStackP23add_stack_java_epilogueEP14DataDescriptorlP11FramePacketxjP6VectorIP8DbeInstrEPS4
_IP8HistableEb@Base 2.41
+
_ZN10CallStackP23add_stack_java_epilogueEP14DataDescriptorlP11FramePacketxjP6VectorIP8HistableES8_b@Base
2.43.50.20241112-1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gprofng/32356] New: [2.44 Regression] missing symbols in libgprofng0,
doko at debian dot org <=