[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison 1.30f
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Bison 1.30f |
Date: |
12 Dec 2001 16:29:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) |
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
Paul> If so, it seems to me that the following patch would be
Paul> worthwhile even before we modify Bison to output beautiful C++
Paul> code. Hans, can you please check whether it works for you with
Paul> C++? (It passes Bison's 'make check' test for C.)
If you can reach an agreement, then please, Paul, install your patch
on both branches. But I failed to see any such need personally. I do
use Bison output with a C++ compiler, G++, and it does work fine. I
am not happy to see more weird stuff in bison.simple than there was
already before.
After all, you can have another skeleton with you own C++ stuff.
I plan to release Bison with a week, please, people, make up your
minds quickly. Mine is made: it works as is on the platforms we aim
at, with the C++ compiler we promote.
- Re: Bison 1.30f, (continued)
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/10
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/11
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/11
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/11
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/14
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/14