[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:56:36 +0100 |
Le 27 déc. 05 à 18:46, Akim Demaille a écrit :
Le 22 déc. 05 à 19:49, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
Would it be worthwhile to warn about unmentioned typed $$ as well?
The correct handling of $$ is troublesome when there are midrule
actions.
More generally, what exactly do we want in case of midrule actions?
Say (every symbol is typed):
exp: A { act1 } B { act2 } { action };
should act1 complain about not using $1? But what about its $$,
which is its actual value. We can't do anything about it, we
don't know its type.
should act2 complain about $1 even if act1 uses it? Again, it can't
say anything about $3.
Finally, should action warn about $$, $1, and $3 even if they were
used in midrule actions?
- Re: %destructor feedback, (continued)
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/12/21
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/21
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/21
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/23
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/27
- Re: %destructor feedback,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/12/29
Re: %destructor feedback, SteveBravy, 2005/12/22