[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: portability fix for bison-1.75
From: |
Mark Linimon |
Subject: |
Re: portability fix for bison-1.75 |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:16:01 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:03:07PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bison 1.75 is pretty old and has several known bugs. I'm not sure I'd
> recommend it for widespread use these days.
Yes, but we still have 160 ports that depend on it.
mcl
- portability fix for bison-1.75, Dieter, 2006/01/20
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/20
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75,
Mark Linimon <=
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Kris Kennaway, 2006/01/21
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/20
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Kris Kennaway, 2006/01/21
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/23
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Mark Linimon, 2006/01/23
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/23
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Kris Kennaway, 2006/01/23
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/23
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/23
- Re: portability fix for bison-1.75, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/23