[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:22:10 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) |
Hi Juan,
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:
> Sorry, but I have not followed this mailing list for some time
Thanks for responding. I wasn't sure if you followed the list or not, but
I knew you occasionally contributed patches to update djgpp support. I
figured we were about to break it, so I wanted to send you a warning.
> so I will assume
> that you want to use gnulibs pipe.[ch] files to implement the required pipe
> functionality for bison.
Right. In my previous email, I proposed a patch to do that for the rest
of Bison. Most likely, I'll apply that to branch-2.4.2, branch-2.5, and
master. If someone discovers a problem, I might leave it out of
branch-2.4.2, but I hope not.
> That will be ok with me as long as the gnulib main-
> tainers allows me to introduce some djgpp specific code to emulate the missing
> pipe support on FreeDOS/MSDOS/djgpp.
Hopefully so. If they reject it for some reason, maybe we can find a way
to make the replacement directly in Bison.
> The djgpp specific functionality would go into the new file djgpp-spawn.h and
> would only be include when using djgpp. If my assumptions about your
> intention
> are correct, then I think we can remove the old subpipe module and use
> gnulib's pipe.[ch] instead.
> I have downloaded gnulib's pipe.[ch] to start coding the djgpp specific issues
> and to test them.
That sounds great. Bruno Haible is listed as the maintainer for that
module, so he'll likely be the person who reviews your work. Of course,
you'll need to make sure you have a copyright assignment on file for
gnulib.
Thanks for your help.
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, (continued)
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Joel E. Denny, 2010/02/02
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Joel E. Denny, 2010/02/02
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Albert Chin, 2010/02/02
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Joel E. Denny, 2010/02/02
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Akim Demaille, 2010/02/03
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Joel E. Denny, 2010/02/03
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Joel E. Denny, 2010/02/03
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Joel E. Denny, 2010/02/04
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Joel E. Denny, 2010/02/04
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Juan Manuel Guerrero, 2010/02/06
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Joel E. Denny, 2010/02/22
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Akim Demaille, 2010/02/03
- Re: Test 52 failure on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Albert Chin, 2010/02/02