bug-bison
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: incompatibility between 2.7 and 3.0.2


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: incompatibility between 2.7 and 3.0.2
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:14:18 +0200

Le 8 sept. 2014 à 06:08, Aharon Robbins <address@hidden> a écrit :

> Hi.

Hi Aharon,

> We're doing some experimental gawk development, and have found that
> there is a difference if using bison 2.7 or 3.0.2.  If you check out
> the gawk repository from savannah and checkout the 'comment' branch,
> then
> 
>       ./boostrap.sh
>       ./configure && make && make check
> 
> Only a few tests will fail, which we're working on.
> 
> However, if you remove awkgram.c and use bison 3.0.2 to regenerate
> it, then run
> 
>       make && make check
> 
> A larger number of tests fail with errors due to line numbers being
> off and also a core dump, apparently from a semantic action not
> getting run, or run correctly.

Do you know what rule is not executed?  The parser is hard to
read, it does not seem to use Bison's location tracking, and
there are no %printer to assist the debugging.

When I enable the debug traces, all the differences there are
before 2.7 and 3.0 is:

--- old.log     2014-09-08 12:07:06.000000000 +0200
+++ new.log     2014-09-08 12:08:03.000000000 +0200
@@ -1817,4 +1817,4 @@
 Stack now 0 1 2
 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
 Cleanup: popping nterm program ()
-gawk: test/arrayparm.awk:13: fatal: attempt to use array `i (from foo)' in a 
scalar context
+gawk: test/arrayparm.awk:7: fatal: attempt to use array `i (from foo)' in a 
scalar context

which is a bit short to try to debug.  What test actually
fails with a SEGV?  What did Valgrind report?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]