[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton |
Date: |
Sun, 19 May 2019 14:34:28 +0200 |
> On 19 May 2019, at 13:38, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Le 19 mai 2019 à 12:58, Frank Heckenbach <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>
>> Akim Demaille wrote:
>>
>>>> Le 19 mai 2019 à 11:02, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Also a spelling error: copiable.
>>>
>>> I'm installing this. Thanks a lot Hans!
>>>
>>> fix: use copiable, not copyable
>>
>> Am I missing something? Seems like "copyable" is a valid alternative
>> form:
>>
>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/copiable
>>
>> and commonly used in C++:
>>
>> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_trivially_copyable
>
> Bummer. Reading 'copiable' felt so weird…
I felt the opposite. :-)
> But the dictionary I checked had it, and not 'copyable’.
Probably the same as I did (see my other post). It has varied historically [1].
> I'll revert that for 3.4.1 then…
You must choose what you feel is best. Here is a video on the topic of English
spelling history.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqLiRu34kWo
1.
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=copiable%2Ccopyable&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t4%3B%2Ccopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bcopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BCopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B.t4%3B%2Ccopyable%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bcopyable%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BCopyable%3B%2Cc0
- (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Don Macpherson, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Akim Demaille, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Hans Åberg, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Akim Demaille, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Hans Åberg, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Frank Heckenbach, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Akim Demaille, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Akim Demaille, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Hans Åberg, 2019/05/19
- Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton, Hans Åberg, 2019/05/19