[Bug classpath/22898] missing swing classes :?

[gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org]

I tried to run batik with kaffe-cvs (1.1.5) and gnu-classpath, and this was the
output:

address@hidden:/tmp/batik-1.5.1$ /usr/pkg/java/kaffe-cvs/bin/kaffe -jar 
batik.jar 
java.lang.NullPointerException
   at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicProgressBarUI.getPreferredSize
(BasicProgressBarUI.java:388)
   at javax.swing.JComponent.getPreferredSize (JComponent.java:1020)
   at java.awt.BorderLayout.calcCompSize (BorderLayout.java:655)
   at java.awt.BorderLayout.calcSize (BorderLayout.java:697)
   at java.awt.BorderLayout.preferredLayoutSize (BorderLayout.java:454)
   at java.awt.Container.preferredSize (Container.java:620)
   at java.awt.Container.getPreferredSize (Container.java:607)
   at javax.swing.JComponent.getPreferredSize (JComponent.java:1024)
   at javax.swing.JRootPane$RootLayout.preferredLayoutSize (JRootPane.java:278)
   at java.awt.Container.preferredSize (Container.java:620)
   at java.awt.Container.getPreferredSize (Container.java:607)
   at javax.swing.JComponent.getPreferredSize (JComponent.java:1024)
   at java.awt.BorderLayout.calcCompSize (BorderLayout.java:655)
   at java.awt.BorderLayout.calcSize (BorderLayout.java:700)
   at java.awt.BorderLayout.preferredLayoutSize (BorderLayout.java:454)
   at java.awt.Container.preferredSize (Container.java:620)
   at java.awt.Container.getPreferredSize (Container.java:607)
   at javax.swing.JWindow.getPreferredSize (JWindow.java:115)
   at org.apache.batik.apps.svgbrowser.Main.<init> (source file unknown)
   at org.apache.batik.apps.svgbrowser.Main.main (source file unknown)
   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke0 (Method.java)
   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java:255)
   at kaffe.jar.ExecJarName.main (ExecJarName.java:67)
   at kaffe.jar.ExecJar.main (ExecJar.java:75)
address@hidden:/tmp/batik-1.5.1$ 


------- Comment #1 from from-classpath at savannah dot gnu dot org  2005-05-13 
12:44 -------
I fixed this bug in GNU Classpath CVS head. Batik does now start up, but does
still not work properly. I will close this bug nevertheless. Thank you for
reporting.

/Roman


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22898