[Bug classpath/22789] IPv6 support is incomplete

[gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org]

------- Comment #2 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org  2008-02-17 20:25 
-------
Some support has been added since this bug was failed, including:

2007-06-25  Dalibor Topic  <address@hidden>

        * native/jni/java-net/gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl.c
        (THROW_NO_IPV6): New macro.
        (Java_gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl_bind6) Conditionally
        build code if IPv6 facilities are available, otherwise
        throw an error.
        (Java_gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl_setMulticastInterface6,
        Java_gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl_join6,
        Java_gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl_leave6,
        Java_gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl_joinGroup6,
        Java_gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl_leaveGroup6)
        Use THROW_NO_IPV6.

        * native/jni/java-net/java_net_VMInetAddress.c
        (Java_java_net_VMInetAddress_getHostByAddr,
        Java_java_net_VMInetAddress_getHostByName,
        Java_java_net_VMInetAddress_aton) Build IPv6 dependant
        code conditionally on IPv6 facilities being available.
        Switched if-else blocks where necessary to allow that.

        * native/jni/java-net/javanet.c
        (_javanet_get_ip_netaddr) Build IPv6 dependant code conditionally
        on IPv6 facilities being available.

        * native/jni/native-lib/cpnet.c
        (cpnet_getHostByName, cpnet_getHostByAddr) Build IPv6 dependant
        code conditionally on IPv6 facilities being available.
        (cpnet_aton) Moved variable declaration of inet6_addr to the scope
        of its use. Build IPv6 dependant code conditionally
        on IPv6 facilities being available.

        * native/jni/native-lib/cpnet.h (cpnet_newIPV6Address,
        cpnet_isIPV6Address, cpnet_IPV6AddressToBytes,
        cpnet_bytesToIPV6Address): Make IPv6 dependant utility functions
        available conditionally on IPv6 facilities being available.

What exactly was required for this bug?  It seems a little unspecific.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789