[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug cp-tools/28012] Strange error message from appletviewer
From: |
egallager at gcc dot gnu.org |
Subject: |
[Bug cp-tools/28012] Strange error message from appletviewer |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:41:50 +0000 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28012
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Norman Hendrich from comment #8)
> Subject: Re: Strange error message from appletviewer
>
> OK; I ran my HTML through the W3C validator, which resulted in 40+ errors.
>
> Apart from the typical lazyness (no "alt" for images etc.), it seems that
> my assumption of xhtml being xml was completely false.
> Obviously, there are some special rules that certain tags (e.g. <meta> and
> <param>) neither require nor allow a closing tag. Perhaps MS was right to
> ignore the W3C standards, after all?
>
> I removed the "closing" </param> tags that I added with the best intentions,
> and the classpath appletviewer now starts the applet...
>
>
> ----
>
> > Okay, so is this bug fixed/invalid?
>
> I don't know. I guess our parser should ignore unknown tags like
> <Xparam> or </param>, instead of crashing with obscure error messages.
> At least the JDK and some of the major browsers handle the original page,
> W3C conformity or not.
>
> If someone wants to test the classpath parser again, I moved the original
> (w3c invalid) page at:
>
> http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/applets/jfig/applet-nonw3c.html
Sounds like INVALID then.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug cp-tools/28012] Strange error message from appletviewer,
egallager at gcc dot gnu.org <=