[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cut (coreutils) 5.2.1
From: |
Phil Aylesworth |
Subject: |
Re: cut (coreutils) 5.2.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:16:39 -0500 |
Bob,
Just to let you know, I have upgraded from Fedora 2 to Fedora 3 and
cut is now working fine. Fedora 3 uses the RPM package
coreutils-5.2.1-31 while in Fedora 2 it was coreutils-5.2.1-7.
Since it is the same version of coreutil, it must have been a compile
time problem.
Phil.
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:43:18 -0400, Phil Aylesworth
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Bob,
>
> That is interesting. I tried the exact example you gave and got:
> $ printf "1\t2\t3\n" > t1
> $ printf "4\t5\t6\n" > t2
> $ cut -f1 t1 t2
> 1
>
> That last line is a blank. I will try recompiling when I get a chance.
> Maybe I should report this bug to fedora.
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 22:33:44 -0400, Bob Proulx <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Phil Aylesworth wrote:
> > > I am sure this is a bug in cut (coreutils) 5.2.1.
> >
> > Thank you for your bug report.
> >
> > > When cut is used with the option "-f1" it will not output the results
> > > from more than one file given as arguments. Instead it outputs a blank
> > > line for each file beyond the first. cut works correctly with "-f" if
> > > 1 is not included, "-c", or piping to standard input.
> >
> > I cannot recreate this behavior with cut from coreutils-5.2.1.
> >
> > printf "1\t2\t3\n" > t1
> > printf "4\t5\t6\n" > t2
> > cut -f1 t1 t2
> > 1
> > 4
> >
> > > I am running Fedora Core 2 Linux.
> >
> > I am running Debian GNU/Linux. But I also tested the pristine latest
> > version and it worked fine as well.
> >
> > Perhaps you could compile the latest stable released coreutils from
> > source? I am expecting that it will work fine.
> >
> > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.2.1.tar.gz
> >
> > Bob
> >
>
>
> --
> Phil Aylesworth
>
--
Phil Aylesworth
- Re: cut (coreutils) 5.2.1,
Phil Aylesworth <=