[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program
From: |
Dmitry V. Levin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:38:05 +0300 |
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:02:37PM +0000, Philip Rowlands wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> >If small size is all you want, I can do a lot better than that:
> >
> >$ ls -l true
> >-rwxr-xr-x 1 eggert eggert 10 2004-11-19 22:18 true
> >$ ./true; echo $?
> >0
>
> Can't beat this for size:
>
> $ ls -l true
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 prowlands users 0 Nov 20 12:59 true
> $ ./true; echo $?
> 0
>
> (The implementation is left to the reader. :-)
Yes :) but execve(2) returns ENOEXEC:
$ env -i strace ./true
execve("./true", ["./true"], [/* 0 vars */]) = 0
strace: exec: Exec format error
--
ldv
pgpnmKLB9XeTQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/11/20
Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Felipe W Damasio, 2004/11/21