[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Possible bug.
From: |
Harley D. Eades III |
Subject: |
Possible bug. |
Date: |
16 Jan 2005 09:14:36 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Hello,
While creating a file to use for debugging parted I used
the command `head -c 10m /dev/zero > ./gnu' then used `ls -sh ./gnu' to confirm
the 10m file was created and noticed ls reported it as 11m. Confused, I
issued `head -c 11m /dev/zero > test && ls -sh ./test' and ls -sh reported
test as 12m. Still confused I issued another this time below 10m
`head -c 5m /dev/zero > test && ls -sh ./test' and ls -sh reported it as 5.1,
interesting. I had a with talk Alfred Szmidt and he recommend me to report
it.
This was all done under Debian GNU/Hurd.
hurd:~# ls --version
ls (coreutils) 5.2.1
Written by Richard Stallman and David MacKenzie.
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>From `info ls':
`-h'
`--human-readable'
Append a size letter to each size, such as `M' for mebibytes.
Powers of 1024 are used, not 1000; `M' stands for 1,048,576 bytes.
Use the `--si' option if you prefer powers of 1000.
There is a typo in `info ls' as you can see above mebibytes, should that be
megabytes?
hurd:~# head --version
head (coreutils) 5.2.1
Written by David MacKenzie and Jim Meyering.
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>From `info head':
`-c N'
`--bytes=N'
Print the first N bytes, instead of initial lines. Appending `b'
multiplies N by 512, `k' by 1024, and `m' by 1048576. However, if
N starts with a `-', print all but the last N bytes of each file.
So 10m is 10*1048576
Test:
/bin/head -c 1m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
1.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 2m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
2.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 3m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
3.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 4m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
4.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 5m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
5.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 6m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
6.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 7m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
7.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 8m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
8.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 9m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
9.1M ./test
/bin/head -c 10m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
11M ./test
/bin/head -c 11m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
12M ./test
/bin/head -c 12m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
13M ./test
/bin/head -c 13m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
14M ./test
/bin/head -c 14m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
15M ./test
/bin/head -c 15m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
16M ./test
/bin/head -c 16m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
17M ./test
/bin/head -c 17m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
18M ./test
/bin/head -c 18m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
19M ./test
/bin/head -c 19m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
20M ./test
/bin/head -c 20m /dev/zero > test
/bin/ls -sh ./test
21M ./test
END TEST:
As you can see everything below 10m is X+0.1 meg and everything above 10m is
X+1 meg, this does not seem correct.
Thanks
Harley D. Eades III
P.S If all replies could be CC'd to address@hidden I would appreciate it.
I am currently not a member of this list.
- Possible bug.,
Harley D. Eades III <=