[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: better buffer size for copy
From: |
Robert Latham |
Subject: |
Re: better buffer size for copy |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:46:59 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:07:51PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> address@hidden (Robert Latham) writes:
>
> > In the time since the above thread was started, there is now an
> > implementation of lcm in src/system.h.
>
> I'd rather use something more like buffer_lcm in diffutils, since it
> handles weird cases without dumping core.
>
Ok, no problem. In the old thread you wanted a new file under lib to
contain the implementation of buffer_lcm. Coreutils now has a lot of
inlined routines in src/system.h, so would it be better to add
buffer_lcm to src/system.h, or stick with creating new files under
lib/ ?
Thanks
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
Argonne National Labs, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B
- better buffer size for copy, Robert Latham, 2005/11/04
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Paul Eggert, 2005/11/05
- Re: better buffer size for copy,
Robert Latham <=
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Paul Eggert, 2005/11/07
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Robert Latham, 2005/11/07
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Robert Latham, 2005/11/18
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Phillip Susi, 2005/11/19
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Robert Latham, 2005/11/20
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Phillip Susi, 2005/11/21
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Robert Latham, 2005/11/22
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Phillip Susi, 2005/11/22
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Paul Eggert, 2005/11/24
- Re: better buffer size for copy, Jim Meyering, 2005/11/24