Re: Coreutils 5.93 patched with 5.91 POSIX ACL patch test results - Update

[Albe]

Hi,

here is the answer

address@hidden:~/coreutils-5.93/src# ./mkdir -p a/b/c
address@hidden:~/coreutils-5.93/src# ./ls -dgo a/b/c
drwxr-xr-x 2 48 2005-12-02 14:26 a/b/c

i suppose it's correct.

Anyway, i forgot to say that yesterday i ran a complete test with the 
Linux Testing Project engine and had a few FAIL only with the PAN 
module. Don't ask me what does this mean though, i had no time to 
investigate ;-)

Thanks.


Alberto



Jim Meyering wrote:
> Albe <address@hidden> wrote:
> ..
>   
> > The following is the required debug dump of the fail-perm on the
> > original slackware 10.2 virtual machine:
> >
> > make: Entering directory `/root/coreutils-5.93/tests/cp'
> > make  check-TESTS
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/coreutils-5.93/tests/cp'
> > + cp --version
> > cp (GNU coreutils) 5.93
> >     
> ..
>   
> > + mkdir -p fail-perm.tmp/15251
> > + cd fail-perm.tmp/15251
> > ./fail-perm: line 17: cd: fail-perm.tmp/15251: Not a directory
> >     
>
> Thanks for running the test.
> It suggests that the above `mkdir -p ...' command didn't do its job.
>
> Please try a few commands manually.
> >From the coreutils-5.93/src directory, run these commands:
>
>   ./mkdir -p a/b/c
>   ./ls -dgo a/b/c
>
> Here's what I get:
>
>   $ ./mkdir -p a/b/c
>   $ ./ls -dgo a/b/c
>   drwxr-xr-x 2 6 Dec  2 13:41 a/b/c
>
> If you don't get similar results, can you use a debugger to
> see what's going wrong?
> .
>
>