[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug in chdir-safer
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
bug in chdir-safer |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:03:35 +0000 |
I like the newly-added chdir-safer. However, you need to
provide a dummy #define O_NOFOLLOW 0 for platforms
like cygwin which have not yet implemented this feature.
if gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -I. -I. -I..
-I.. -I. -g2 -Wall -MT chmod-safer.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/chmod-safer.Tpo" -c
-o chmod-safer.o chmod-safer.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/chmod-safer.Tpo" ".deps/chmod-safer.Po"; else rm -f
".deps/chmod-safer.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
chmod-safer.c: In function `fchmod_new':
chmod-safer.c:68: error: `O_NOFOLLOW' undeclared (first use in this function)
chmod-safer.c:68: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
chmod-safer.c:68: error: for each function it appears in.)
chmod-safer.c: In function `chmod_safer':
chmod-safer.c:116: error: `O_NOFOLLOW' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[3]: *** [chmod-safer.o] Error 1
--
Eric Blake
- bug in chdir-safer,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: bug in chdir-safer, Eric Blake, 2005/12/22
- Re: bug in chdir-safer, Jim Meyering, 2005/12/23
- Re: bug in chdir-safer, Eric Blake, 2005/12/24
- Re: bug in chdir-safer, Jim Meyering, 2005/12/25
- Re: bug in chdir-safer, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/25
- Re: bug in chdir-safer, Jim Meyering, 2005/12/26
- Re: bug in chdir-safer, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/26