[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2006 00:25:59 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Andrew Pinski <address@hidden> writes:
> This was rejected like three or more times already.
No, the patch in question
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27434>
was incorrectly marked to be a duplicate of
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14251>.
They are not the same bug.
On 2005-06-15 you noted in bug#14251 "Coreuitls has been fixed so lets
close this as will not fix." But this comment is incorrect for the
POSIX incompatibilities fixed by the patch proposed for GCC bug #27434.
This is why it was an error to mark 27434 as a duplicate of 14251.
Can somebody please reopen bug #27434 and apply its patch to GCC?
Unlike the patches proposed for 14251, the 27434 patch shouldn't break
builds on older (pre-POSIX) systems.
Thanks.
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Brian Dessent, 2006/05/02
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Andrew Pinski, 2006/05/02
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Zack Weinberg, 2006/05/03
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/03
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Mike Stump, 2006/05/24
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Andrew Pinski, 2006/05/24
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2006/05/24
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Andrew Pinski, 2006/05/25
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/26
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Andrew Pinski, 2006/05/26
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/26
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2006/05/26
Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/03