[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#369468: coreutils: ls.1 implies that -v is not a sort option
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Bug#369468: coreutils: ls.1 implies that -v is not a sort option |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 2006 08:24:41 +0200 |
Justin Pryzby <address@hidden> wrote:
> Package: coreutils
> Version: 5.94-1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: upstream patch
> X-Fuzzies-Translation: yes
>
> :.!man ls |grep -i sort
> Reformatting ls(1), please wait...
> Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuSUX nor --sort.
> ^^^^^^^
> [...]
>
> -v sort by version
> ^^^^
>
> --- ls.c 2006-01-21 05:51:16.000000000 -0500
> +++ /tmp/ls.c 2006-05-28 17:52:35.000000000 -0400
> @@ -4100,7 +4100,7 @@
> printf (_("Usage: %s [OPTION]... [FILE]...\n"), program_name);
> fputs (_("\
> List information about the FILEs (the current directory by default).\n\
> -Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuSUX nor --sort.\n\
> +Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort.\n\
> \n\
> "), stdout);
> fputs (_("\
Thanks.
Applied upstream.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Bug#369468: coreutils: ls.1 implies that -v is not a sort option,
Jim Meyering <=