Re: mistake in sort -k argument processing?

[Evan Hunt]

> Just like you can ignore a .1 in the start spec.  But you can't ignore a
> .0 in a start spec, because it is wrong.  You can't denote the _end_ of
> the start field.

Very well.  In that case, let's edit the documentation to reflect that .0
represents the end of the field, and I'll be happy.  (Though my personal
preference is to silently ignore.)

Evan Hunt