[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mv
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: mv |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:14:18 +0100 |
"James Youngman" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 3/23/07, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The fact that you mailed the obsolete bug-fileutils list implies that you
>> may be due for an upgrade. fileutils merged into coreutils, and the
>> latest stable version is now 6.9.
>
> Is it time perhaps to automate responses for the various obsolete lists?
That would be great, if there is a way to ensure that the responses go
only to legitimate senders. I've just updated the file (only in git/cvs),
README-package-renamed-to-coreutils, with a few more URLS:
------------------------------------------
As of 2002-09-01, the GNU fileutils, textutils, and sh-utils
packages have been merged into one, called the GNU coreutils.
See http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ for a description.
Here's the FAQ list:
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/
For information on the mailing lists associated with the
coreutils package, see these:
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/coreutils-announce
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
mailing list archives are here:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.announce
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.bugs (up to the minute)
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-coreutils/ (updated every 12 hours)
- mv, Fabian . Hombsch, 2007/03/22
- Re: mv, Bauke Jan Douma, 2007/03/22
- Re: mv, Eric Blake, 2007/03/23
- Re: mv, James Youngman, 2007/03/23
- Re: mv, Pádraig Brady, 2007/03/23