[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: df not for subfs?
From: |
cool_mail |
Subject: |
Re: df not for subfs? |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:12:53 +0100 |
Hello Phillip,
thanks for your answer, I'will update to 10.3 before new year, but first do any
important things ... I think about murphy's law ;-)
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:29:21 -0500
> Von: Phillip Susi <address@hidden>
> An: "Günter" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Betreff: Re: df not for subfs?
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > It appears that something failed getting the file system values. Try
> > debugging this using strace. The following produces useful debug
> > output on my GNU/Linux system for usb storage devices.
>
> Most likely that is the case as this subfs does not appear to have been
> actively maintained since 2004, before the 2.6 kernel series new world
> plug and play order came about. I'd suggest updating your distribution
> to a new one that does not use subfs.
>
>
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger