bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: coreutils-6.11 released


From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: coreutils-6.11 released
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:04:10 +0200

Elbert Pol <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Elbert Pol<address@hidden>  wrote:
>>> I try that build, but is fails now at a earlyer point.
>>
>> Well, your logs show that configure succeeded, which means the
>> failure is _later_.  And that means my patch solved the problem.
>>
>>> I attach logs
>>
>> Thank you.
>> The first interesting part is here:
>>
>>      In file included from file-set.h:2,
>>                       from file-set.c:20:
>>      sys/stat.h:267:8: operator '!' has no right operand
>>      make.exe[3]: *** [file-set.o] Error 1
>>
>> That suggests that HAVE_LSTAT is not expanded as expected in
>> lib/sys/stat.h.  The template, lib/sys_stat.in.h has this:
>>
>>      #if ! @HAVE_LSTAT@
>>      # define lstat stat
>>      #endif
>>
>> yet, the diagnostic above suggests your lib/sys/stat.h looks like this:
>>
>>      #if !
>>      # define lstat stat
>>      #endif
>>
>> Contrast that with your config.log file, which says
>>
>>      #define HAVE_LSTAT 1
>>
>> So, would you please post both your lib/sys/stat.h,
>> to confirm, and config.status, since it is the file
>> responsible for performing the substitution that may be failing.

[ Etiquette problems: you dropped the bug-coreutils Cc: on your
  reply.  Please stop doing that.  It makes more work for us.

  It's easier to follow discussions like this is you do not "top post".
  I.e., include newer comments at the bottom, not at the top.
  I've just moved your comments to the bottom.  ]

> Hmmm hoi Jim,
>
> Thats indeed strange.
>
> I attach both files

Thank you.
They show that your stat.h file comes from coreutils-6.11,
not from the snapshot.  The build problem is actually coming
from the mkdir-related block just after the one I mentioned above,
and that particular problem appears to be fixed in the snapshot,
thanks to Bruno's gnulib patch to work around a mingw build failure.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]