[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: date,,,
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: date,,, |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:14:56 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Gnthoralf on 4/24/2008 2:13 AM:
| Hello,
| I have the following bug in date,
| if I type date +%s the unixtimestamp is correct, but if I type "date" then I
| have 23 sec difference. I use suse 9 distro, with ntpd.
Sounds like it might be due to the number of leap seconds that have
occurred since 1970?
| date version is date (GNU coreutils) 5.93.
Consider upgrading; the latest stable version is 6.11 (although it is
unlikely to change the behavior you observe).
| -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
| Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
|
| mIsERq2P1AEEAKnYh7yis5xF+2UpPMdgaE4uRMKJAw6quqwO/VPFASVQWAVakhNj
Wow - your mail has a higher percentage of line noise than content; you
may want to consider posting merely an URL to your public key rather than
sending the entire ascii-armored block in every mail; particularly since
your mail wasn't even gpg signed.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkgQh9AACgkQ84KuGfSFAYCvowCeMdHTLD6eeR9ycA+DYoVyihPM
6lQAn0uKjRJML1LcYkQfjUmg2oC8neHO
=sJ+N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- date,,,, Gnthoralf, 2008/04/24
- Re: date,,,,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: date,,,, Bob Proulx, 2008/04/24