[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:35:12 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
> What about those older SYSV-derived systems where stat --format %G $(tty)
> prints the primary group of the user running who?
I wonder how they get the functionaly of write.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?, Jim Meyering, 2008/07/07
- Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?, James Youngman, 2008/07/07
- Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?, Matthew Woehlke, 2008/07/09
- Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?, Jim Meyering, 2008/07/11
- Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?, Andreas Schwab, 2008/07/11
- Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?, Jim Meyering, 2008/07/11
- Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?,
Andreas Schwab <=
Re: is hard-coding the group name, "tty", portable enough for who -a?, Eric Blake, 2008/07/14