Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?

[Paolo Bonzini]

> So -ol (that's an el) would mean line-buffered stdout?
> That has to be equivalent to -o -l, and unless you consider
> ordering and multiple -l options (e.g., "-i -l -o -l" is ugly),
> then it doesn't let you line-buffer more than one of the three streams.

It would be "+i::o::e::" in getopt parlance; no argument = no buffering,
argument is "l" = line buffering, argument is numberic = given-size buffer.

Paolo